During the due diligence period, the buyer does an inspection and asks for repairs. The seller may prefer to give money, and not want to actually do the repairs because (1) they fear that the buyer will not be happy with the repairs and will ask the seller to redo them; (2) they may not have sufficient time to schedule repairs, pack, and move; (3) they simply do not want to have to take the time and effort to have them done.
The buyer may also prefer that the seller give money in lieu
of repairs because (1) the buyer can oversee the repairs and be sure that they
are to the buyer’s liking; (2) the buyer may want to do other modifications
related to the trade at the same time and the money can simply go towards the
larger bill; (3) the buyer may find it worthwhile to postpone the repair and
use the money now.
In the instance where both sides agree to money in lieu of
repairs, the buyer has several choices: he/she can reduce the purchase price by
the agreed-upon amount, or have that amount added to seller-paid closing
costs. Previously, we could have checks written at closing to third party
vendors for the repairs to be performed later, but with the tightened mortgage
restrictions that is generally not possible. Which is preferable –reducing the sales price or increasing the closing costs? Here are the
pros and cons:
- Either way, the buyer
brings less cash to closing.
- The lender typically
will limit the amount of closing costs the seller can pay on behalf of the
buyer. For most loans, it’s three percent of the purchase
price. So just be sure that if you’re increasing the closing costs
paid by the seller, you’re not running afoul of this limit.
- If you decrease the
purchase price, the purchase price is reflected in the tax records and
future buyers will see that you paid less for the place. The plus
side is that the tax commissioner also looks at the purchase price in
determining taxable value, so a lower purchase price may result in a lower
property tax burden.
No comments:
Post a Comment